Beer and Taxes

To people who don't really know how to think about it...
--------------------------------------------------------------------

"Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh would pay $7.
The eighth would pay $12.
The ninth would pay $18..
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59..

So, that's what they decided to do. The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve.

'Since you are all such good customers, he said, 'I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20.' Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes SO the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free.

But what about the other six men - the paying customers? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair share?'

They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.

So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.

And so:

The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).
The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28%savings).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
The tenth now paid $50 instead of $59 (15% savings).

Each of the six was better off than before.

And the first four continued to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings. 'I only got a dollar out of the $20,' declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man, 'but he got $9!'

'Yeah, that's right,' exclaimed the fifth man. 'I only saved a dollar, too. It's unfair that he got nine times more than I!'

'That's true!!' shouted the seventh man. 'Why should he get $9 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!' 'Wait a minute,' yelled the first four men in unison. 'We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor.'

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction.

Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.

David R. Kamerschen, Ph.D.
Professor of Economics, University of Georgia

For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.

Redistribution of Wealth

Here is a creative approach to redistribution of wealth as offered in a local newspaper...

Today on my way to lunch I passed a homeless guy with a sign that read "Vote Obama, I need the money." I laughed.

Once in the restaurant my server had on a "Obama 08" tie, again I laughed as he had given away his political preference--just imagine the coincidence.

When the bill came I decided not to tip the server and explained to him that I was exploring the Obama redistribution of wealth concept. He stood there in disbelief while I told him that I was going to redistribute his tip to someone who I deemed more in need--the homeless guy outside. The server angrily stormed from my sight.

I went outside, gave the homeless guy $10 and told him to thank the server inside as I've decided he could use the money more. The homeless guy was grateful.

At the end of my rather unscientific redistribution experiment I realized the homeless guy was grateful for the money he did not earn, but the waiter was pretty angry that I gave away the money he did earn even though the actual recipient deserved money more.

I guess redistribution of wealth is an easier thing to swallow in concept than in practical application.

"We" Don't Care

The official line from the major media pundits is that everyone knows the Ayers story and "we" don't care.
More government control and more government programs are the solution to the the economic problems caused by government affirmative action housing programs. Apparently Colin Powell thinks so, anyway -well, that and an African American president would "electrify the world".

Maybe so, but I think folks who refuse to accept "conventional wisdom" dispensed through the television and newspapers have a very good reason to be more than uneasy about a candidate who so casually lies about the true nature of his associations. This video is the best, most accurate wrap of the facts, except for the fact that Ohio is now sitting on 200,000 suspect registrations that Sec of State Brunner went to the Supreme Court to avoid verifying. She won, because a political party didn't have standing to sue. Nice law...

Please watch when you get a chance - forward if you agree it matters.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cH7kT4xwddg

Global Warming How COOL

A group of Greepeace activists mildly ($35k) vandalized a coal fired power plant in England, but were

found Not Guilty with the help of "expert witness" James Hansen, Al Gore's (and George Soros') pal at NASA.

In a world that has been in a cooling trend for 10 years now, how is it that he/they get away with it?

http://www.wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/09/10/note-to-nasa-fire-dr-james-hansen-now

Fear for all

Kind of a long read, but very informative on how "opinion" is formed as a very lucrative business.
The best example might be a Chicago utility using this company to create a fake "citizens campaign"
to create worries about blackouts, thus getting opinion to change on the need for hefty rate hikes.

http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/194057.php